翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Paul Viiding
・ Paul Viljoen
・ Paul Villinski
・ Paul Vilmond Savard
・ Paul Vinar
・ Paul Vincent Carroll
・ Paul Vincent Donovan
・ Paul Vincent Dudley
・ Paul Vinitsky
・ Paul Vinogradoff
・ Paul Vinsnes
・ Paul Urquhart
・ Paul Usher
・ Paul Usteri
・ Paul v British Columbia (Forest Appeals Commission)
Paul v Constance
・ Paul v National Probation Service
・ Paul v. Clinton
・ Paul v. Davis
・ Paul V. Gadola
・ Paul V. Hester
・ Paul V. Johnson
・ Paul V. Kelly
・ Paul V. Kroskrity
・ Paul V. McNutt
・ Paul V. Niemeyer
・ Paul V. Priolo
・ Paul V. Roberts
・ Paul V. Scura
・ Paul v. United States


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Paul v Constance : ウィキペディア英語版
Paul v Constance

''Paul v Constance'' () (EWCA Civ 2 ) is an English trust law case. It sets out what will be sufficient to establish that someone has intended to create a trust, the first of the "three certainties". It is necessary that a settlor's "words and actions ... show a clear intention to dispose of property ... so that someone else acquires a beneficial interest."〔''Paul v Constance'' () 1 WLR 527 (CA)〕
==Facts==
Mr Constance’s marriage broke down, and he moved in with Ms Paul. After a workplace accident he received £950 in damages, and following discussions with a bank manager, paid it into a new joint account. They were unmarried, so the account was just put in Mr Constance’s sole name. He said repeatedly, ‘the money is as much yours as mine’. They paid in joint bingo winnings too, and they made a £150 withdrawal, which they split. But 13 months after Mr Constance died without a will. Ms Paul claimed the account was hers. Mrs Constance reappeared and claimed the money was hers.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Paul v Constance」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.